Friday, February 9, 2018

When it comes right down to it, are we ALL racist, sexist, etc? - a philosophical discussion of my thoughts.


Time for a philosophical discussion on discrimination.

Yesterday, I watched an interesting video about racism within the LGBTQ community as if pertains to dating. The question that was posed dealt with someone in this community (that is considered a “minority” group of the population) and the idea that “I don’t date <insert race here>” is a “preference” versus a “racist” statement. So, for example, if you are gay, but your dating profile reads “Asians only” or “No Asians need apply”, are you being racist? According to this video, many in this community will state “I’m just not into black men (or any other race), that’s just my preference”. That those who say it, don’t feel they are being racist, it’s just how they “feel”.

My initial thought is that IS discrimination to feel this way.

So this got me wondering further about dating sites specifically, and then that was followed with society in general, and then finally people as a whole. The video was saying that if you refuse to date someone of a certain race, you are making your choice based on a “stereotype” or “general assumption” ABOUT that race. So if you refuse to date someone who is black, Asian, or even white, you are making a racist decision based on some preconceived idea about the entire race.

When I look around, MOST couples I know are made up of 2 people of the same race. I know several interracial couples, but the majority, are not.

We have laws that protect people of all races from being discriminated against. So why are dating sites allowed to ask for your race? Being that I have been married for 30+ years, I have no need for dating sites, and I met my wife LONG before websites even existed. But I remember the infamous “personal ads” found in newspapers of my day. “SWF” (Single White Female) was a common phrase that could be found in these ads, followed by specifics that were desired by the ad’s owner. From my understanding, this is still somewhat the format in use on dating sites today. So why are you allowed to advertise for these “racist” requirements?

To push this idea to the limit, why are you allowed to state your “gender” on these sites? Since gender is considered “separate” and “different” from your biological sex, is it not “sexist” to be looking for someone to date based on biological sex or gender?

I am not arguing to remove discrimination laws, or the protection of minority groups, but if we have dating “preferences” are we ourselves not “discriminating” against certain “groups”? I’ve read so many articles about racism, sexism, microaggressions, safe spaces, etc. I have been called a racist for disagreeing with an idea someone has because their race is different from mine, when in fact, my idea was simply different. I have been told that “because I am not part of a certain ‘group’, that my thoughts are therefore ‘invalid’.” So now I’m wondering if those who attacked me based on my race or sex being different, are the same people who have “preferences” in their dating lives. Do these “preferences” they have give me the right to respond with calling them “racist”, “sexist”, or whatever other name I can find for them?

Should the laws against discrimination be applied to dating websites that ask your “preferences” (a.k.a. ALL OF THEM)? Is much of what we call “discrimination” nothing more than a farce perpetuated by political agendas? Have we become so sensitive to our differences, and because we are now offended by every idea that is different than our own, that we look for some sort of discrimination to be the root cause of these differences?

When it comes to dating “by race”, are most people in fact “racist”? If men only want to date women, or women dating only men, are they being “sexist”? (I’m guessing that the question of being sexist will be answered with “what about having children as the goal?”). The video I watched ended with congratulating people who decide to change their dating profiles to reflect “no racial preference”.

So for this discussion, I want to ask, “is it ‘wrong’ to have a preference (race or even gender) in a dating partner?” Second, “are you someone who is offended by discrimination, but then discriminate against certain groups when dating?” “Does your dating partner offend you BECAUSE they discriminate whom they will date?” Finally, “has the envelope of discrimination been pushed so far that we can no longer tell where the problem begins and where it ends?”

4 comments:

  1. We have preferences from the moment we’re born. Then we are taught/learn a host of others until we die. Hopefully as intelligent humans we will use our intellects to dispense with those that have no basis in fact. (Making certain that our facts are truly facts and not someone else’s preference!)
    I’m too old for much of this to matter. We’re all human and it is difficult not to be prejudiced at some level about some things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can agree with what you say, but my question extends even further. It seems to me that we will never eliminate all prejudices because as humans, we have an "innate" need to find others like ourselves. These are our "preferences". But I think we have cheapened the term "racism" by saying that ANYTHING slightly resembling a preference based on something that makes us similar to others is automatically a type of discrimination". While it may be just that, the real question is, "Are all types of discrimination actually wrong?"

      Delete
  2. Define “wrong”. Beside the 10 Commandments it would seem to be difficult to brand a preference as “wrong” . You make an interesting point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trying to define the word "wrong" opens a whole new can of worms. Is "wrong" what the majority declares as "wrong"? Is it whenever someone's feeling get hurt? Is it simply up to interpretation by each and every person? Look at history. Not everyone thought slavery was "wrong". It was decided based on the outcome of a war where so many lives were lost. (I know the war was about a lot more than slavery, but the outcome determined that it would be classified as "wrong". today we look back and it seems obvious to us that it was wrong. But is that because it is the general consensus? What is actually telling us that it was wrong? Conditioning? The law? Traditions? Traditions told us it was "right"! Is it just different traditions that tell us it's wrong? Has human thinking really evolved to truly see it as wrong? Or does it go back to who won the war? There are still many people today who deal in the slave trade. There are those who buy those slaves. Obviously these people don't see it as wrong. Are we more "enlightened"? Or do we just have different traditions?

      Delete