Time for a philosophical discussion on discrimination.
Yesterday, I watched an interesting video about racism within
the LGBTQ community as if pertains to dating. The question that was posed dealt
with someone in this community (that is considered a “minority” group of the
population) and the idea that “I don’t date <insert race here>” is a “preference”
versus a “racist” statement. So, for example, if you are gay, but your dating
profile reads “Asians only” or “No Asians need apply”, are you being racist?
According to this video, many in this community will state “I’m just not into
black men (or any other race), that’s just my preference”. That those who say
it, don’t feel they are being racist, it’s just how they “feel”.
My initial thought is that IS discrimination to feel this way.
So this got me wondering further about dating sites specifically,
and then that was followed with society in general, and then finally people as
a whole. The video was saying that if you refuse to date someone of a certain
race, you are making your choice based on a “stereotype” or “general assumption”
ABOUT that race. So if you refuse to date someone who is black, Asian, or even
white, you are making a racist decision based on some preconceived idea about
the entire race.
When I look around, MOST couples I know are made up of 2
people of the same race. I know several interracial couples, but the majority,
are not.
We have laws that protect people of all races from being
discriminated against. So why are dating sites allowed to ask for your race?
Being that I have been married for 30+ years, I have no need for dating sites,
and I met my wife LONG before websites even existed. But I remember the infamous
“personal ads” found in newspapers of my day. “SWF” (Single White Female) was a common phrase that could
be found in these ads, followed by specifics that were desired by the ad’s
owner. From my understanding, this is still somewhat the format in use on
dating sites today. So why are you allowed to advertise for these “racist”
requirements?
To push this idea to the limit, why are you allowed to state
your “gender” on these sites? Since gender is considered “separate” and “different”
from your biological sex, is it not “sexist” to be looking for someone to date
based on biological sex or gender?
I am not arguing to remove discrimination laws, or the
protection of minority groups, but if we have dating “preferences” are we
ourselves not “discriminating” against certain “groups”? I’ve read so many
articles about racism, sexism, microaggressions, safe spaces, etc. I have been
called a racist for disagreeing with an idea someone has because their race is
different from mine, when in fact, my idea was simply different. I have been
told that “because I am not part of a certain ‘group’, that my thoughts are therefore
‘invalid’.” So now I’m wondering if those who attacked me based on my race or
sex being different, are the same people who have “preferences” in their dating
lives. Do these “preferences” they have give me the right to respond with calling
them “racist”, “sexist”, or whatever other name I can find for them?
Should the laws against discrimination be applied to dating
websites that ask your “preferences” (a.k.a. ALL OF THEM)? Is much of what we
call “discrimination” nothing more than a farce perpetuated by political
agendas? Have we become so sensitive to our differences, and because we are now
offended by every idea that is different than our own, that we look for some
sort of discrimination to be the root cause of these differences?
When it comes to dating “by race”, are most people in fact “racist”?
If men only want to date women, or women dating only men, are they being “sexist”?
(I’m guessing that the question of being sexist will be answered with “what
about having children as the goal?”). The video I watched ended with
congratulating people who decide to change their dating profiles to reflect “no
racial preference”.
So for this discussion, I want to ask, “is it ‘wrong’ to
have a preference (race or even gender) in a dating partner?” Second, “are you
someone who is offended by discrimination, but then discriminate against
certain groups when dating?” “Does your dating partner offend you BECAUSE they
discriminate whom they will date?” Finally, “has the envelope of discrimination
been pushed so far that we can no longer tell where the problem begins and
where it ends?”
We have preferences from the moment we’re born. Then we are taught/learn a host of others until we die. Hopefully as intelligent humans we will use our intellects to dispense with those that have no basis in fact. (Making certain that our facts are truly facts and not someone else’s preference!)
ReplyDeleteI’m too old for much of this to matter. We’re all human and it is difficult not to be prejudiced at some level about some things.
I can agree with what you say, but my question extends even further. It seems to me that we will never eliminate all prejudices because as humans, we have an "innate" need to find others like ourselves. These are our "preferences". But I think we have cheapened the term "racism" by saying that ANYTHING slightly resembling a preference based on something that makes us similar to others is automatically a type of discrimination". While it may be just that, the real question is, "Are all types of discrimination actually wrong?"
DeleteDefine “wrong”. Beside the 10 Commandments it would seem to be difficult to brand a preference as “wrong” . You make an interesting point.
ReplyDeleteTrying to define the word "wrong" opens a whole new can of worms. Is "wrong" what the majority declares as "wrong"? Is it whenever someone's feeling get hurt? Is it simply up to interpretation by each and every person? Look at history. Not everyone thought slavery was "wrong". It was decided based on the outcome of a war where so many lives were lost. (I know the war was about a lot more than slavery, but the outcome determined that it would be classified as "wrong". today we look back and it seems obvious to us that it was wrong. But is that because it is the general consensus? What is actually telling us that it was wrong? Conditioning? The law? Traditions? Traditions told us it was "right"! Is it just different traditions that tell us it's wrong? Has human thinking really evolved to truly see it as wrong? Or does it go back to who won the war? There are still many people today who deal in the slave trade. There are those who buy those slaves. Obviously these people don't see it as wrong. Are we more "enlightened"? Or do we just have different traditions?
Delete